"What Was Governor Doing For 3 Years?" Supreme Court On Tamil Nadu Bills
The top court - which is hearing similar pleas by the Punjab and Kerala governments - also raised a point of law - "can a Governor withhold assent on a bill without sending it back to the Assembly?"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d646/5d646c09668fead4f4e3bdfdcd0760b1473bd0ea" alt=""
The Supreme Court on Monday asked tough questions of Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi, as it resumed hearing the Tamil Nadu government's plea against prolonged delays in clearing bills. "These bills were pending since 2020. What was he doing for three years?" the court asked.
The top court - which is hearing similar pleas by the Punjab and Kerala governments - also raised a point of law - "can a Governor withhold assent on a bill without sending it back to the Assembly?"
The court's strong observations come days after Mr Ravi returned ten bills - two of which were passed by the earlier AIADMK government. A furious Tamil Nadu Assembly then held a special session on Saturday to re-adopt all ten bills, which were sent back to the Governor for his assent.
The court this morning noted this development and said, "Assembly has passed the bills again and sent it to the Governor. Let us see what Governor does," as it adjourned the matter till December 1.
"Once bills are re-passed, they are on the same footing as money bills," the court pointed out.
The court noted that Mr Ravi had assented to 162 of 181 bills presented to him.
The court also noted the Governor of any state, under Article 200, has three options - assent to bills presented to him, withhold that assent, or send it to the President of India.
"The proviso says Governor may send it to state government for reconsideration. Can the Governor withhold assent on a bill without sending it back to the Assembly?" it asked.
Mr Ravi had earlier also returned the NEET Exemption Bill, after much delay, and forwarded it to the President of India only after the Assembly passed the bill again. He adopted a similar stance over a bill seeking a ban on online gaming. "Withholding bills is a courteous way of saying no..." he said.